Posted
7:14 PM
by Gene
Perfesser Shafer makes a strong case that those inopportune loudmouths of Cable Nuisance Network and The Daily Kaplan should not have been punished. But he also says:
[B]iases shouldn't be thought of as invasive weeds, choking the garden, but as nutrients. The job of a journalist is to gather evidence, test it, and come to conclusions wherever feasible. Such an enterprise is impossible to undertake without biases. Indeed, like scientific inquires, almost every new story always begins with some sort of bias or hunch or leaning. A reporter or an editor thinks this story is more promising or interesting than that story, therefore they agree to pursue it. But without reporting both stories—or every possible story, which is impossible—how can the editor and reporter really know which was the "right" story to assign? They can't. They can only trust their biases.Agreed -- but what happens when nearly everyone in the news biz shares the same biases?