Eugene David
...The One-Minute Pundit

Wednesday, February 25, 2004


EIGHTY-NINE YEARS AGO:

When Griffith released [The Birth of a Nation] in 1915, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (or NAACP) and other groups protested; the NAACP published a 47-page pamphlet titled "Fighting a Vicious Film: Protest Against The Birth of a Nation," in which they referred to the film as "three miles of filth." W. E. B. Du Bois published scathing reviews in The Crisis, spurring a heated debate among the National Board of Censorship of Motion Pictures as to whether the film should be shown in New York. However, President and former history professor Woodrow Wilson viewed the film at the White House and proclaimed it not only historically accurate, but like "history writ with lightning." Like Woodrow Wilson, many whites felt it a truthful and accurate portrayal of racial politics, so much so that they flocked to join the rejuvenated Ku Klux Klan. [Emphasis added.] The years after Griffith released The Birth of a Nation saw massive race riots throughout the country, peaking especially in the North in 1919; many historians lay the blame for this racial conflict on Griffith's The Birth of a Nation.

Think to yourself: how many people these days talk about The Birth of a Nation?

P. S. I am not among those who believe David Wark Griffith should be expunged from film history; after all, he invented film's grammar, syntax, and most of its words. But his actions led to racial violence, and though I doubt anything approaching a rejuvenated KKK will happen again, given people are just so tired of reliving history (and those praising and opposing P. R. MEL's MASTERWORK are mostly full of their own importance; NRO, for instance, is in total meltdown), films, like words, can have consequences. But how wearying it is to know today's acme of controversy is tomorrow's relic.

Home
Site Meter eXTReMe Tracker