Eugene David ...The One-Minute Pundit |
THE NEWS HACK'S CREED: I know more than you. I make lots more money than you. I'm smarter than you. I'm sexier than you. I appear on TV all the time. I work ten minutes a day. I rule the universe. I'm going to live forever. You are an idiot. THE NEWS HACK'S CREED, No. 2: A lie isn't a lie when it tells THE TRUTH. THE NEWS HACK'S CREED, No. 3: I've come to realize that the looseness of the journalistic life, the seeming laxity of the newsroom, is an illusion. Yes, there's informality and there's humor, but beneath the surface lies something deadly serious. It is a code. Sometimes the code is not even written down, but it is deeply believed in. And, when violated, it is enforced with tribal ferocity. --JOHN "OMERTA" CARROLL. THE NEWS HACK'S CREED, No. 4: News isn't news when we don't report it. PERMALINKS: THE NEWS HACKS' DICTIONARY THE EUGENE DAVID GLOSSARY AMERICA'S MOST UNINTENTIONALLY FUNNY WEB SITE! Blogroll Me! |
Saturday, May 08, 2004
Posted
7:11 PM
by Gene
Fonda: Movie Making Is a Lot Like Sex And how much of yours with TED wound up on the cutting-room floor?
Posted
3:29 PM
by Gene
Another VERY good reason for TEXT MESSAGING.
Posted
3:20 PM
by Gene
All this story says is: 1. Service-station attendants are shaking people upside-down by the ankles, and 2. Little Jeff must buy five more entertainment companies and at least fifteen banks.
Posted
3:00 PM
by Gene
Posted
11:23 AM
by Gene
OR: SHOULD CONSERVATIVES BE CONFUSED? I have received some thoughtful replies to my response to Professor Bainbridge's post, Should Conservatives Be Cheerful? including this Reply to Barnett by Professor Bainbridge, and his endorsement of Legislative Tyranny versus Judicial Tyranny by Owen at Southern Appeal. I believe that these post reflect some basic misunderstanding of the position (mine) with which they disagree. (1) Owen writes: Barnett's answer is remarkably unsatisfying, because it simply argues in favor of one tyranny over another. Under his standards, American society would effectively be ruled by the courts, who would be vested with the authority to judge which moral standards are legitimate and illegitimate, presumably using the old libertarian standard of the "harm principle." This statement is mistaken on two counts. First, I do not advocate the "harm principle." Because we are entitled to "harm" others in many ways, this principle is simply too indefinite to distinguish rightful from wrongful conduct. Rather, in my book I argue, as did Thomas Cooley and Christopher Tiedeman, that the proper exercise of the police power of states extends only to protecting the equal rights of others. (NB: Their treatment of "morals" legislation differ.) If a prohibition cannot be justified as means to protect the rights that everyone has from violation then it is improper. Distinguishing rightful from wrongful conduct is the subject of specific doctrines developed in the private law subjects of property, contracts and torts. These doctrines are developed at the state level. There may be many difficulties with my proposal, and I address these difficulties elsewhere, but this and not the "harm principle" is what I favor. This confusion arises because I have written favorably of Justice Kennedy's opinion in Lawrence and he does invoke the harm principle. This is defensible in extreme (and rare) cases in which there is no harm to others whatsoever, in which case a law is problematic. But, as I said, as we have a right to cause all sorts of harms (or negative externalities) on others, the harm principle is insufficient. Second, it is simply a mistake, but an all-too-common one, to equate legislative power over the citizenry with judicial power over legislatures. Therefore, it is a simple conceptual confusion to equate so-called legislative tyranny with judicial tyranny as if these two phenomena are a symmetrical pair. This error results from unrealistically equating a majority of a legislature with the people themselves, an error the framers of the constitution were careful to avoid. A principal object of the Constitution was to protect the people from legislative majorities, indeed from popular majorities, when motivated by passion or of interest adverse to the rights of their fellow citizens (paraphrasing Madison in Federalist 10). Judicial nullification was thought to be one check among others. The only concern expressed during framing and ratification debates about this check is that it would be too weak, as indeed it has been. (2) Professor Bainbridge writes: Contrary to what Barnett seems to believe, I doubt very much that the founders anticipated the sort of expansive claims of judicial supremacy that underlie recent decisions like Lawrence. Certainly, in the generations immediately after the founders the executive branch resisted expansive judicial supremacy. He then quotes the following from Andrew Jackson: If the opinion of the Supreme Court covered the whole ground of this act, it ought not to control the coordinate authorities of this Government, The Congress, the Executive, and the Court must each for itself be guided by its own opinion of the Constitution. Each public officer who takes an oath to support the Constitution swears that he will support it as he understands it, and not as it is understood by others. It is as much the duty of the House of Representatives, of the Senate, and of the President to decide upon the constitutionality of any bill or resolution which may be presented to them for passage or approval as it is of the supreme judges when it may be brought before them for judicial decision. The opinion of the judges has no more authority over Congress than the opinion of Congress has over the judges, and on that point the President is independent of both. The authority of the Supreme Court must not, therefore, be permitted to control the Congress or the Executive when acting in their legislative capacities, but to have only such influence as the force of their reasoning may deserve. In my book I address the distinction between judicial "nullification," which the founders strongly endorsed, from judicial "supremacy"--i.e. judicial control over coordinate branches--which they said little if anything about. If you reread Jackson's statement carefully, you will see he is saying that the other branches should not blindly follow or defer to the judiciary with respect making assessments of the constitutionality of what they do. It does NOT say that the judiciary should blindly defer to the other two branches of government when the constitutionality of laws comes before them in a case or controversy. In other words, Jackson does not in any way advocate legislative supremacy, which many of today's judicial conservative favor in the name of democratic majoritarianism. On this issue, I strongly recommend David Mayer's excellent study, The Constitutional Thought of Thomas Jefferson. (3) Finally, Professor Bainbridge writes: Confining myself to the blogosphere, however, I would note that Barnett's arguments have not gone uncontested. Barnett asks, for example: "Is discovering and enforcing the original meaning of the Ninth Amendment activism?" Calblog, for one, thinks so: "We ought to respect it, but we can't come to the court to enforce the 9th amendment. Rightfully so, its interpretation belongs in the Congress and statehouses." If anything is statement of conservative "judicial activism," this is. Calblog speculates about what the Ninth Amendment might have meant. I presented evidence about what it did mean (though other scholars disagree). Essentially the Ninth Amendment stands for the proposition that (as against the federal government) unenumerated liberties are entitled to the same protection as enumerated liberties. Recall for 2 years there was no First Amendment. Freedom of speech, press and assembly were all unenumerated rights. NO ONE contended that the enactment of the First Amendment changed anything with respect to the preenactment status of the rights it enumerated, e.g. claiming that the First Amendment would create legal protections that previously did not exist. Textually, from 1789-1791, any law violating the freedom of speech would have been improper under the Necessary and Proper Clause. Enumerating the right of freedom of speech neither enhanced its previous protection nor derogated the protection afforded other liberties not enumerated. As to the latter, so saith the Ninth Amendment. If I am correct about this, and about the meaning of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, then it is judicial activism to say that unenumerated rights are entitled to no protection from legislative infringement because they are unenumerated. Calblog's assertion of this position is itself "activism" of the exact same species that I identified in my earlier post: conservative judicial activists disgarding text that does not satisfy their conception of "the rule of law." As Calblog puts it: "The fear is I think is that if you want the P&I clause to incorporate already vague 9th amendment issues against the states . . . that's a real stretch. Hitchhiking on an already vague provision." Exactly! He does not like this provision because he thinks it is too "vague," so out it goes from the text. There is no difference between him and activists on the left who don't like, for example that Congress has only a limited power over "commerce . . . among the several states." I am sure there will be more to say--in particular the alleged prevalence and enforcement of "antisodomy laws," but this post is already too long as it is. Those who are interested in the historical practice should look at this. And then there is this lengthy post by Clayton Cramer. Ahh. So much confusion, so little time. INDEED. It is true this site ranks 51,529th in Alexa (VERY high for a blog), and I will CONCEDE this writing may be thoughtful to those who can guess what it means (ever LESS reason to trust The Nine Fingers in the Wind) -- but the fact remains, this is 1,337 WORDS, and very few of us have time to read 1,337 WORDS of a WHOLE BLOG, let alone 1,337 WORDS of ONE POST. THIS is why the young engage in TEXT MESSAGING: they have no time for ESSENTIALLY MEANINGLESS WORDS. I've said it before: if only I could BLOVIATE like this, I'd get umpteen gazillion hits a year, but this logorrhea is a WASTE of BANDWIDTH and a CHALLENGE to ONE'S PATIENCE. And WHAT'S TRUE FOR NEWS HACKS APPLIES TO BLOGGERS. Perhaps in honor of such posts we should call the bloviators thereof VOLOKHEADS, but we will reserve the right to do so for a later time. P. S. A special DEMERIT to ANDY S., who seems to think such perpetual spouting of words is WISDOM.
Posted
11:18 AM
by Gene
Posted
11:12 AM
by Gene
THIS IS LIKE NAZIS CONTINUING TO RUN A CONCENTRATION CAMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Another GOOD reason for TEXT MESSAGING.) OR: The U.S.-led coalition has a dozen prisons in Iraq holding about 8,000 inmates. WHY am I thinking the abuses involved a small percentage of all those held? BECAUSE it's ANOTHER GOOD REASON FOR TEXT MESSAGING. (After reading that latest MEA CULPA of NEWS HACKS I'm NOT giving up on it.)
Posted
10:14 AM
by Gene
ANOTHER good reason for TEXT MESSAGING.
Posted
8:11 AM
by Gene
Posted
8:08 AM
by Gene
Big business never is.
Posted
8:01 AM
by Gene
Posted
7:52 AM
by Gene
Posted
7:48 AM
by Gene
We are advancing rapidly into the age of pygmies.
Posted
7:42 AM
by Gene
Translation: most stories can be reduced to a few words, eliminating the need for zillions of column inches of spin and sell. The NEWS HACKS would be doomed without ADVERTISERS. Friday, May 07, 2004
Posted
5:28 PM
by Gene
And of course the second step on the road to Hell will be people DRIVING AND BIKING with them. GREAT IDEA, LITTLE MALCOLM!
Posted
5:13 PM
by Gene
Posted
5:05 PM
by Gene
Posted
5:00 PM
by Gene
MORE GREAT P-ULITZER WINNING PUBLIC SERVICE, there, UBERHACKS!
Posted
2:52 PM
by Gene
Posted
2:43 PM
by Gene
Who will be the first six-digit elitist public-be-damned editor willing to be dragged from his luxury news suite and hanged when Iraq becomes an Islamic fundamentalist state? As with Vietnam, one brave voice (remember Walter Cronkite on Feb. 27, 1968).... Next time, do that in the BATHROOM, Greg.
Posted
1:11 PM
by Gene
Air America's investors include...TV pioneer Norman Lear.... MEATHEAD!
Posted
11:20 AM
by Gene
AND SEN. ESPNCORP'S CALLED A MEETING!! OOOOOOOOOOOH!!!!! LOOKS LIKE THE WORLD'S LEADING PRODUCER OF FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT HAS A LOT OF RODENT DROPPINGS TO SWEEP UP!!!!
Posted
9:29 AM
by Gene
Six of one....
Posted
9:23 AM
by Gene
Posted
9:15 AM
by Gene
NUF SAID, DOUBLE.
Posted
8:50 AM
by Gene
NUF SAID.
Posted
8:39 AM
by Gene
Please, if you think it any good, let others know. While six hits a day is better than three, I nonetheless harbor the hope I can do better still.
Posted
8:19 AM
by Gene
Why the choice between LIFE AFTER FORD and A NEW STONE AGE?
Posted
6:43 AM
by Gene
Posted
6:40 AM
by Gene
Hey P-Ulitzer winners, I really WOULD like to know what's happening in Iraq BESDIES what's going on several months ago.
Posted
6:29 AM
by Gene
Onward to VAN HOSING, LITTLE JEFF!
Posted
6:27 AM
by Gene
What's your next strikeout, ZELIG? Thursday, May 06, 2004
Posted
5:12 PM
by Gene
Possibly the Church is working "expeditiously" because the Church worked like molasses.
Posted
4:58 PM
by Gene
I wish I knew why Kinsley.com runs such flashing-neon teases for this strip. First off, it's a comic strip, so it's automatically BAD (Family Circus BAD, Beetle Bailey BAD, Cathy BAD, Boondocks BAD, it doesn't matter anymore), and second, it's knee-jerk-liberal BAD (just as Mallard Fillmore is knee-jerk-conservative BAD). Comic strips: they're ALL BAD.
Posted
2:14 PM
by Gene
Posted
1:50 PM
by Gene
Tell me, MORONS: how many people want to read you people saying your biz is NEVER WRONG? P. S. I feel sorry for the one person laid off from CJR, even if you are a knee-jerk liberal; hope you find a job soon. My criticism of these tired-blood rags stands.
Posted
1:33 PM
by Gene
(Sorry for the NewsMAX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Posted
1:21 PM
by Gene
Posted
1:16 PM
by Gene
That way OUR TEAM WINS!!!!! NEWS HACKS have developed hundreds of thousands of ways of being DISINGENUOUS. (But we must throw in the obligatory "depressing" so people won't think we're rooting TOO hard.)
Posted
12:27 PM
by Gene
Posted
12:04 PM
by Gene
In what currency? AOL, however, is adding broadband customers - 600,000 more signed up in the quarter.... Gluttons for punishment.
Posted
9:47 AM
by Gene
Fox News Plans Its Own Iraq List Bochco to Develop Iraq War Drama for FX Network Inconvenient juxtaposition courtesy IWantMedia.com.
Posted
9:43 AM
by Gene
Join the crowd, John.
Posted
9:25 AM
by Gene
Time to break out THE NEWS HACKS' DICTIONARY again. OR: ...a glib, moderate figure.... Glib, YES.
Posted
9:11 AM
by Gene
![]() You'll NEVER guess.
Posted
8:25 AM
by Gene
He needs an eye examination. This celebration brought to you by ![]() WE'RE MILITANT ABOUT THE NEWS.™
Posted
6:51 AM
by Gene
History's GREATEST MAN and you treat him like THIS? HE SHOULD SUE! Then again, WE should sue.
Posted
6:32 AM
by Gene
$93 million Picasso breaks record at auction Picasso's 'Boy with a Pipe' sells for $104M The buyer paid a commission, which by my rights is part of the purchase price. This means news hacks debate ALL DAY how much the buyer overpaid.
Posted
6:29 AM
by Gene
Wednesday, May 05, 2004
Posted
7:50 PM
by Gene
Seeking a pay raise, the union promises that tourists will face inadequate hotel and catering services unless their demands are met Why am I thinking, they probably would anyway?
Posted
7:40 PM
by Gene
And reinforcing my suspicions, the equally FOOL EXECUTIVE EDITOR of THE PAPER OF RECORD offered him TV stardom.
Posted
7:26 PM
by Gene
OR: You can join a Catholic ChurchLITE® like DIPPITY-DO!!!!!
Posted
6:14 PM
by Gene
Posted
5:50 PM
by Gene
Will linking to another blog help me? (P. S. I found it through the only non-automated blog that has ever cited me. Is anyone else out there?)
Posted
5:29 PM
by Gene
And note the HED. It's YOUR little Goodthing now, JEFF.
Posted
5:01 PM
by Gene
Colin Powell likes to talk to the composer of the first draft of blah. And with his son they've dictated a veritable SYMPHONY of blah. Here's where I differ with Mr. Hitchens: what happened in those prisons was wrong and must be punished; the problem is, NEWS HACKS being in the FIFTH COLUMN can develop an extreme case of myopia, further intensified by their petty politics and self-centered ways -- hence the mistreatment of Iraqi POWs becomes the Holocaust -- and because so many of us are getting not to trust ONE WORD out of these overbearing millionaire frauds we cannot even be sure of what happened there. Punish the mutineers (as Mr. Hitchens aptly calls them), but don't punish the aim.
Posted
3:11 PM
by Gene
Posted
3:06 PM
by Gene
Meaning -- it's the RIGHT thing to do.
Posted
1:26 PM
by Gene
One reason we HATE your CONSTANT SPIN is YOUR CONSTANT SELL.
Posted
12:17 PM
by Gene
Usually I'd say the people win, but people don't have MAN-power.
Posted
12:00 PM
by Gene
As always, hard-core conservatives try improving their lot by daydreaming.
Posted
11:57 AM
by Gene
OR: "He’s someone you’re glad to have out there, but from a candidate’s perspective you need to keep him at arm’s length," said Steve McMahon former media strategist to Gov. Howard Dean. Hey STEVE! Did you strategize Gov into going YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE- AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGGGGH!!!!!!!!!!?
Posted
11:44 AM
by Gene
That's what news hacks have been trying to do all along. AND AMERICANS WANT THE TROOPS OUT NOW!!!!!!! WE HAVE A POLL TO PROVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yeah. And polls also prove you guys are biased. I say they cancel out. P. S.: ![]() NO THANK YOU.
Posted
11:34 AM
by Gene
OR: The inspector general's report, the first detailed look into how the federal prisons have dealt with extremist beliefs since the Sept. 11 attacks, will likely prove controversial among Muslim leaders, who say they have been subjected to unfair scrutiny and criticism because of their religious beliefs. TRANSLATION: THIS looks like a job for -- SUPERHOOPER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted
6:41 AM
by Gene
Maybe we wouldn't have gotten into this trouble, MICKEYMOUSE NIXON, if THE WORLD'S LEADING PRODUCER OF FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT weren't always so eager to flip the bird to the public -- and if we HADN'T HELPED FINANCE THE THING IN THE FIRST PLACE. By the way, GREAT CHOICE OF WORDS IN THE HED. "For-BIIIIIIIIIIDuhduhduhduh!!!!!" Why didn't you say CENSORS while you were at it? THE PAPER OF RECORD could employ A MILLION PUBLIC EDITORS and THIS WOULD NOT STOP.
Posted
6:29 AM
by Gene
Another reason to DESPISE NEWS HACKS. Tuesday, May 04, 2004
Posted
8:18 PM
by Gene
![]() I've found something quite interesting -- and quite sad: an online history of David Sarnoff and RCA, the electronics and entertainment giant LEGENDARY WELCH eviscerated so he could schmooze in Hollywood. Three things did it in: Japan; technological incompetence (witness RCA's failure in mainframe computers and such famed "innovations" as SelectaVision, a video disc played with a needle); and Sarnoff's son Robert, who turned the company into a second-string conglomerate (Banquet frozen foods, Gibson greeting cards) while letting the company's heritage operations rot, thus making it easy pickins for that Legendary vulture. On my trips to work I cannot avoid RCA's ghosts, for visible on my ride from across the Delaware is a minor-league baseball stadium on the site of the old Victor Talking Machine plant; the building with the stained-glass Nipper is now apartments. Who needs consumer electronics when you have Sony?
Posted
7:53 PM
by Gene
![]() When FITZGERALD belched that there are no second acts in American lives he didn't reckon on someone with two acts. And speaking of which... Mariah Carey is known for her skimpy stage outfits — and now she says she wants to start a line of children’s clothing. Watch out, America; she'll turn us into a nudist camp.
Posted
7:23 PM
by Gene
Gorelick Must Go (Now More than Ever): The disclosures about 9/11 Commissioner Jamie Gorelick's role in policy decisions to maintain, if not erect, the "wall" between domestic law enforcement and anti-terror efforts continue. As reported last week in the Washington Times and noted yesterday by the WSJ editorial page.... [Emphasis added.] Jamie Gorelick may be a scoundrel, but the scoundrel won't be removed if she's a LEFT-WING SCOUNDREL, and so long as ONLY CONSERVATIVE MOUTHPIECES get mad, nothing will happen. We're dealing with two different news forces here: bloggers (and their allies of the right) and NEWS HACKS, forces that have erected walls of their own, and if it's news behind one wall it's partisanship behind the other, and vice versa, and these forces have precious little in common other than a need to bang the drum loudly. I'm tired of getting Rashomon with my news.
Posted
5:27 PM
by Gene
THE DONALD'S GOLDEN NUGGET OF WISDOM #1: Make sure you inherit a LOT of money. THE DONALD'S GOLDEN NUGGET OF WISDOM #2: When in trouble, pass it off to your bondholders. THE DONALD'S GOLDEN NUGGET OF WISDOM #3: Whatever you do, grow hair. (Pardon -- I should have typed THE DONALD'S TRUMP TAJ MAHAL® NUGGET OF WISDOM.)
Posted
5:16 PM
by Gene
Posted
5:03 PM
by Gene
![]() Is it me or am I getting TIRED of seeing that pale green imitation of Satch with two green plastic Bugles chips for ears? ![]() Hey IMMORTAL JACK®! Now that I've pasted some of your SECRET-recipe ALPHABET SOUP® to my blog to show what an absolute NINNY® you are, will you sic the Fumblers, Bumblers and Incompetents® on me for TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT®?????
Posted
4:50 PM
by Gene
How can NEWS HACKS say with any truthfulness this isn't their spin?
Posted
2:24 PM
by Gene
I think one Bob Pittman's enough. JOKE OF THE DAY: [PETRIFIED]...hopes [the network] will become an independent voice in a media industry dominated by large conglomerates.... SURE. From VIVENDI to PETRIFIED to VIACON, if the price is right.
Posted
2:19 PM
by Gene
SINCLAIR RAISES RED FLAG ABOUT MEDIA MERGERS VIEWERS WITH PVR'S DON'T SKIP BEER COMMERCIALS, SAYS STUDY I say it's a draw.
Posted
11:20 AM
by Gene
You following in LEGACY's footsteps, Dubya?
Posted
11:18 AM
by Gene
This doesn't surprise me either. (Double caveat: it's a NEWSMAX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and it involves Don "Flatulence" Imus.)
Posted
11:10 AM
by Gene
If you guessed the Nation or Mother Jones or the Progressive, you may be right. Those liberal mags have pummeled Bush's war unmercifully. Vanity Fair has also weighed in with several attacks. But the correct answer just might be "the American Conservative." I'm NOT surprised. BRAVEHEART PAT would have opposed WORLD WAR II.
Posted
10:37 AM
by Gene
Sincerely, Andrew I. Killgore, Ambassador to Qatar, 1977-1980 Richard H. Curtiss, former chief inspector, U.S. Information Agency Colbert C. Held, Retired FSO and author Thomas J. Carolan, Counsel General Istanbul, '88-'92 C. Edward Bernier, Counselor of Embassy, Information and Culture, Islamabad, Pakistan Donald A. Kruse, American Consul in Jerusalem Ambassador Edward L. Peck, former Chief of Mission in Iraq and Mauritania John Powell, Admin Counselor in Beirut, '75-'76 John Gunther Dean, last position held U.S. Ambassador to India Greg Thielmann, Director, Office for Strategic Proliferation Military Affairs, Bureau of Intelligence and Research James Akins, Ambassador to Saudi Arabia Talcott Seeyle, Ambassador to Syria Eugene Bird, Counselor of Embassy in Saudi Arabia Richard H. Nolte, Ambassador to Egypt Ray Close, Chief of Station Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 1971-1979 Shirl McArthur, Commercial Attache, Bangkok TRANSLATION: Ka-CHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hey KIDS! Look who quoted himself in Arabnews.com -- under the title "US Elections: Arab-Americans Become Active"!!!!! VERY DISINTERESTED of you, MR. FORMER CHIEF INSPECTOR.
Posted
9:59 AM
by Gene
(Slightly astonishing coming from DOW 36,000. I thought business could do no wrong!)
Posted
6:49 AM
by Gene
That pretty much describes all the pundits who work for RUPERT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted
6:35 AM
by Gene
BUT: [P]ulling in a number like this has to be encouraging for a show that just came off its weakest February sweeps in more than a decade in total viewers and among the 25-to-54-year-olds who are the currency of news programming. Oh, that was the wrong thing to say, wasn't it, "Nightline" folks? Try to forget it. Put it out of your minds. That should be easy with its following.
Posted
6:28 AM
by Gene
SERF! Get my wallet from my pants.
Posted
6:26 AM
by Gene
![]() I'm surprised TWX BAD Cable News hasn't been FLOODED with complaints for making this man look like the Devil.
Posted
6:23 AM
by Gene
The hottest-selling item in a local manufacturer's new medical equipment catalog is a hospital walker sturdy enough to assist a patient weighing up to 500 pounds. Monday, May 03, 2004
Posted
6:49 PM
by Gene
Among those cited are Anthony Lake, a group seeking to abolish the death penalty, a wonk for George Soros, and someone from the ACLU. REALLY, SUPERHOOPER, we MUST honor the Reut with an award -- and we'll name it for Alan Elsner!
Posted
6:08 PM
by Gene
Posted
5:34 PM
by Gene
A Carroll County Circuit Court judge has ordered the county commissioners to pay nearly $20,000 in legal costs for an adult-themed store that fought county attempts to shut it down. I know it when I see it when I feel it when I smell it when I...never mind.
Posted
5:26 PM
by Gene
OR: Jeff Gordon said his car was hit by a bottle after the race, a week after fans littered the track at Talladega Superspeedway with cans and containers at the end of that race. When will rowdy fans give NASCAR an IMAGE PROBLEM?
Posted
5:22 PM
by Gene
Like the MILK marketplace?
Posted
5:17 PM
by Gene
![]() Today, I'm reminded maybe terrorists did -- with a boomerang-curved three-story building and those all-too-symbolic prison bars.
Posted
5:10 PM
by Gene
Whenya gonna sell WaPost and The Buffalo News, St. Warren?
Posted
5:09 PM
by Gene
So much for the MORAL POWER of GORE. Right "Dr." Dobson?
Posted
5:07 PM
by Gene
Does anti-Muslim behavior include CRITICIZING TERRORISM, SUPERHOOPER? Have we ever thought of doing some sort of award, Hoop? The Reut should win SOMETHING.
Posted
3:47 PM
by Gene
Maybe they'll make an exception this year. If not, it's bad news for the protesters -- THEY get low ratings too.
Posted
2:58 PM
by Gene
Posted
1:16 PM
by Gene
Oh, $hut up, $age.
Posted
12:30 PM
by Gene
He further tries proving something by celebrating David Brock; but if ErrAmerica has demonstrated anything it's that determined media types can run through millions in a glance. Besides, once a sellout, always a sellout.
Posted
10:00 AM
by Gene
Who needs the Catholic Church?
Posted
8:56 AM
by Gene
Posted
8:46 AM
by Gene
Next stop: TV AD BLURBS. I don't see any difference among THE PAPER OF RECORD's copywriters. They all manage to be reverse snobs. And NO, GAWKER, I'm NOT impressed that you "PREDICTED" this, and to find out I'd have had to read tons of political CW and smarmy talk about show-biz and sex. FINALLY, IN HONOR OF A GREAT...er, REVIEWER: AHHHHHHHHHHHHH (clap-clap! CLAP!! clap-clap! CLAP!!) AHHHHHHHHHHHHH (clap-clap! CLAP!! clap-clap! CLAP!!) AHHHHHHHHHHHHH (clap-clap! CLAP!! clap-clap! CLAP!!) AHHHHHHHHHHHHH (clap-clap! CLAP!! clap-clap! CLAP!!) AHHHHHHHHHHHHH (clap-clap! CLAP!!) AHHHHHHHHHHHHH (clap-clap! CLAP!!) AHHHHHHHHHHHHH (da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da BOOM!!) That's the LEAST we can do for a man who tried to rehabilitate John Landis. (Note the STORY LINK. I did it because THE PAPER OF RECORD's has expired -- but this is better: NOTE WHO RUNS THE SITE. You'll be in good company from now on, EL! ![]() TCB indeed!!!!!)
Posted
8:35 AM
by Gene
TRANSLATION: When the craze dies down and a lot of people discover the more "rare" knickknacks you sell, the lower the prices, a lot of people go broke. YEP, between this and our celebration this morning I think we've fully healed from THE SCANDAL.
Posted
8:30 AM
by Gene
Posted
6:44 AM
by Gene
He was worth it though, right, Larry? JUST FOR BEING A CEO.
Posted
6:36 AM
by Gene
People who don't know their rear ends from a hole in the ground want to tell US what to do?
Posted
6:32 AM
by Gene
Awwwwwwwww, pooooowh Democwats. Mean ol' nasty WEPUBWICANS ought to let them in. RIGHT, Howell [sic].
Posted
6:30 AM
by Gene
...as defined by egghead papers in tomes no one reads, and by patents, many for useless inventions. Didn't they say the same thing around the time of Sputnik?
Posted
6:26 AM
by Gene
Sunday, May 02, 2004
Posted
6:26 PM
by Gene
Posted
3:55 PM
by Gene
NEWS HACKS! Do your duty. An extra DOLLOP of DIPPITY-DO!!!!!
Posted
11:55 AM
by Gene
Isn't it time for a change of op-ed scenery, LENNY?
Posted
11:36 AM
by Gene
Or in other words, THE PAPER OF RECORD could have 10,000 PUBLIC EDITORS, and ONE GLIBERAL would spoil the whole broth. (And thanks to the very foolish scribbling of ONE PUBLIC EDITOR, we will never refer to it as the Times again, but as THE PAPER OF RECORD -- IN ITALICS.)
Posted
8:15 AM
by Gene
The WEB is CLEARLY hurting movie attendance and limiting most of the masterworks to ONE WEEK. It gets out the word ever faster among the core stupid-teen audience that MORE MOVIES STINK MORE THAN EVER -- and even stupid teens don't like wasting their money.
Posted
7:59 AM
by Gene
You're one of my first destinations Sunday mornings because I know you can MAKE ME LAUGH.
Posted
7:55 AM
by Gene
Posted
7:51 AM
by Gene
Since when can illiterates write?
Posted
7:49 AM
by Gene
Maybe CHENEYCOR...er, Halliburton isn't all THAT bad.
Posted
7:47 AM
by Gene
|